Re: ACHK cough
Posted by Sharon on 8/12/10
JC, Wow! Where exactly is the great water front mansion I use to own? I seem to have misplaced it. Can you send me pictures so I know what to look for? I think you must have a dillusional fixation on what the lives of all people from Ole Miss are like. Fiddle dee dee. I am going to have to think about this one another day. Now: back to what is important stuff to be put on ToxLaw and shared among websites in order to stop a deception in health marketing (agnotology) from occurring in our courts: http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/arizona-appellate-court-defines-outrageous-behavior- and-then-proceeds-to-practice-it-just-like-the-san-diego-courts-have-for-five-years-over-the-same- issues-fraud-in-health-marketing-by-the-us/ On 8/12/10, Deborah wrote: > JC, > > You know perfectly well that people die from fungal infections, for you to suggest otherwise is > deliberately deceitful. The science has been surpressed for so long that when I asked 4 doctors > back in 2001 if it were possible to have a fungal infection of the sinus, they all said, "NO" > immediately and unequivocally; 2 were ENTs. Were they lying or incompetent and does it matter > which if you are the person suffering? > > Shame on you. > > > http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dkp507 > > On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote: >> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote: >>> JC >>> >>> Like I said you assume facts not in evidence in your hypotheses which causes your conclusions >>> to be incorrect based on the false assumptions. >> >> The facts are the photographs of your home, RV, Pool, Aerial Satellite square footage of your >> dwelling, and the price of a square foot of prime waterfront property. A half millon wouldn't >> have been enough to make you whole. You know the term location, location, location; and where >> you presently live just would not compare. Park the RV at the husbands business, and the boat >> gets stored a someone's storage. For a Rancho Santa Fe property you downsized, nice but not >> what you had come accoustomed. What ever else got used up on starting a mold is gold campaign >> that has you embroiled in a continuing legal drain of funds. >> >> Not intrested in your personal life because you are a public figure for mold, and you don't >> qualify for a personal life status anymore. Your still the same stuborn adolecence that never >> learned to fold a losing hand. Date Ole Miss? Thats a hoot, even though they have are >> deversified and lost the rebel mascot, the intelligent quotient there, wouldn't support a >> decent conversation. Get back on topic! Why would a person die from mold? How many funerals >> have you attended from those lost to the green, black fungus? It's only happening in your > mind >> becauses someone put it in print, and you like to copy and paste the news of a popensity to >> harm. >> >> jc >> >>> >>> 1. My house was under 2000 sf. It was a beautiful little gem. But small. Got more than >>> enough had I been inclined to remodel from top to bottom. >>> >>> Not even going to bother with the rest. Why are you always so interested in my personal >>> life? Are you sure I didn't turn you down for a date or something at your favorite >>> university in the whole world - Ole Miss? >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote: >>>> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote: >>>>> JC, >>>>> >>>>> 1. I received close to a half a million dollar settlement in my private litigation of 8 >>>>> years ago. More than enough to get my old house fixed if I was so inclined to do so. >>>> >>>> A half a millon doesn't come close to replacing a house that size, not even close to the >>>> amount orginaly awarded to your freind Ms Ballard. You left the house and moved into town >>>> closer to your husbands business and have ravine and walking path in place of a lake view. >>>> No pool where you had a pool, and no place to park that big RV,or dock the boat. I know >>>> those prices you tried to get in Rancho Sante Fe, those were in the millons. You settled >>>> for what you could get so have the attorneys paid. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2. People made contributions to my legal defense fund Because I was the first to >>>>> publicly write of the deception of the US Chamber of Commerce's marketing campaign for >>>>> the courts in the writing in question. It is kind of important to shut this down. Five >>>>> years later, the case is still in the courts and will continue in the courts until this >>>>> stopped as it is harming MANY. >>>> >>>> People made request for your legal defense fund because your actions resulted in a >>>> judgement your still trying to get out of, which benefited Thrasher, and Shoemaker; who >>>> depended on you to get the winds blowing in their direction as being a solution to mold >>>> related problems. It's not the Chambers paper or the opposing view paper that is harming >>>> anybody. You got yourself into a political tail spin and can't get out with your dignity >>>> intact. There are no mold people being found with toxins. None. >>>>> >>>>> 3. There is no monitary judgement being paid on my behalf. Quit making stuff up, John! >>>> >>>> There is a judgement and it is costing you dearly. You might not have had to cut back on >>>> the number of packs of cigarrettes you smoke but it is a drain. Can you go another 5 >>>> years? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 4. I'm sorry. I don't know Sandra Tyson but do know thousands of others pleading for >>>>> help. Shutting down the deceit of the Chamber will help stop this. >>>> >>>> You should know Sandra Tyson, you should Frank, you should know Mary; they were the grass >>>> roots supporting your cause. The Chamber is a personal issue of which you picked the >>>> battle. It had no bearing on Sandra Tyson. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 5. I left ACHEMMIC. I can't speak for what they do or do not do. >>>> >>>> Why do good people put their name on a petetion, or join a political group when they don't >>>> know what they do or not do. At your national level of recognition don't you think you >>>> should be sure of an association before put your name with theirs. >>>>> >>>>> 6. You still sound bitter that all did not go well for you 10 years ago and if things did >>>>> not go well for you, then they should not go well for anyone else. Wrong attitude for >>>>> one to live their life by. >>>> >>>> Things did go exceptionaly well for us, we avoided having our nest egg washed away with >>>> Katrinia, We were able to place the children in private school, and an ivy league collage. >>>> We are thus far avoiding the massive layoffs not seen for 36 years. I can play golf or >>>> tennis with the children, where once I was looking for fuel to heat the home. Your >>>> settlement was two years prior to our settlement; so no the M. Ballard mold is gold rush >>>> wasn't used as it had no bearing. Two honest men set the sights for the litigation of >>>> breach of contract, not mold. It was really never an issue. The Chamber of Commerce Paper >>>> has no influence when the court takes all evidence at face value. Find the people that are >>>> covered in mold and that is your beginning. The mold era is over, even if your case hasn't >>>> been dismissed. >>>> >>>> jc >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sharon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote: >>>>>> On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote: >>>>>>> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this >>>>>>> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone >>>>>>> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure >>>>>>> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a >>>>>>> public forum with you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US >>>>>>> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven >>>>>> all >>>>>>> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media >>>>>>> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want >>>>>>> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on >>>>>> your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to >>>>>> pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can >>>>>> argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations >>>>>> use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the >>>>>> individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could >>>>>> have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and >>>>>> others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama. >>>>>> >>>>>> Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in >>>>>> the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's >>>>>> health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your >>>>>> and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is >>>>>> gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable >>>>>> inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has >>>>>> been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC >>>>>> and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies >>>>>> their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste >>>>>> site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your >>>>>> groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your >>>>>> people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of >>>>>> numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to >>>>>> mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear >>>>>> the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided >>>>>> enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those >>>>>> statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some >>>>>> of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science. >>>>>> >>>>>> jc
Posts on this thread, including this one
- ACHEMMIC, 8/08/10, by Deborah Daniels.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by JohnCodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: Lack of Transparency cause for concern, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: Lack of Transparency cause for concern, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACMEE, 8/13/10, by 15 US deaths.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/17/10, by johncodie.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: JC, 8/18/10, by johncodie.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Deborah.
- Re: JC, 8/18/10, by Deborah.
|