Re: ACHEMMIC
Posted by Deborah on 8/11/10
sounds a bit familiar, but there were so many, many. was she the one with a neighbor who died from the exposure? On 8/10/10, Sharon wrote: > I know Jeannie Mosley. She is a very smart, self taught woman. She > reads a gazillion science papers and then has an uncanny aptitude > to interpret them into plain language, common sense. I learn alot > from her. > > On 8/10/10, Deborah wrote: >> >> "Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the >> validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I >> think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too, >> as far as I know." Sharon >> >> Yes, Sharon, you are correct. Mold-induced illness is real and it >> makes one susceptible to many other pathogens, illnesses and >> chemicals. The POA paper is very important, I wish it had been >> out when this started for me. It was hard fighting against the >> current while most were telling me I was either imagining things, >> exaggerating or nuts. >> >> JC, >> >> Just when I find myself starting to agree with some of your >> points, you derail somewhere. >> >> I don't know anything about Jeanine Moseley, but I hope that she >> is doing okay. >> >> >> >> On 8/10/10, Sharon Kramer wrote: >>> John Codie, >>> >>> Where on earth do you get this stuff? For such a skeptic, you >>> are quite a conspiracy theory nut! >>> >>> None of the authors of that paper - which is put out by >>> Policyholders Of America - is promoting false science. It is >>> all well documented by scientific reference. >>> >>> CIRS from WDB is an illness that the Department of Labor >>> awarded disability to an air traffic controller well over a >>> year ago. It is all properly disclosed who does what in this >>> issue. >>> >>> What you don't seem to understand is that in order to show >>> conflict of interest, you have to be able to show: >>> >>> a. that someone published misleading scientific information >>> b. that they did it for financial motivation. >>> >>> That is not the case with this paper. >>> http://www.policyholdersofamerica.org/doc/CIRS_PEER_REVIEWED_PAP >>> ER.pdf >>> >>> As far as ACHEMMIC, I too left the org. I did this about a >>> month ago. It was hampering my ability to speak out directly >>> of the politics behind the deceit of the US Chamber et al. >>> which definately qualifies under criteria a & b above for >>> conflicts of interest causing the promotion of false science. >>> >>> Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the >>> validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I >>> think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too, >>> as far as I know. >>> >>> Sharon >>> >>> On 8/10/10, JohnCodie wrote: >>>> On 8/08/10, Deborah Daniels wrote: >>>>> To Whom It May Concern: >>>>> >>>>> I was affiliated with the aforementioned group using my >>>>> married name of Davitt. I have recently resigned from this >>>>> group to which I contributed virtually nothing. >>>>> >>>>> I wish to take the time to point out that there is a member >>>>> on the board, one Lee Daniels, listed as a public health >>>>> advocate, who is not a relative of mine or in any way >>>>> connected to my family. I have no personal knowledge of >>>>> this person or his/her activism in IAQ issues. >>>>> >>>>> Sincerely, >>>>> >>>>> Deborah Daniels Davitt >>>> >>>> I pulled up the membership list and found alot of wolfs in >>>> sheep skins. Many ready and able to take up your cause for >>>> a special fee. They got together to write their own >>>> position paper; while claiming the US Navy has their own >>>> mold remediation guidelines. Just more sheepskin to cover >>>> the money blood hungry of wanting to obtain federal funding >>>> for mold studies. The US Navy builds their primary >>>> resicence out either steel, or fiber glass; wood products >>>> providing fuel for harmful toxic fumes are not desired. The >>>> most proficient manual for toxic removal is the acidic >>>> cleaning of the toliets. So why would this group take a >>>> Katrina handout provided to rescue workers for Katrina >>>> clearly giving outdated references to the New York City >>>> Guidelines and try to turn it into a Federal Mold Guideline >>>> Document? So it would legitimize their position? I >>>> champion and applaud your decision. I only wish Sharon >>>> would likewise disassociate. The group is no more than a >>>> Tea party soliciting for funds so support their gravy >>>> train. What is a bandwagon without the hay, just a buch of >>>> boobs, on public display. jc >>>> >>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- ACHEMMIC, 8/08/10, by Deborah Daniels.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by JohnCodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/10/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/11/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: Lack of Transparency cause for concern, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHEMMIC, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: Lack of Transparency cause for concern, 8/12/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/12/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACMEE, 8/13/10, by 15 US deaths.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Deborah.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/13/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by johncodie.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/16/10, by Sharon.
- Re: ACHK cough, 8/17/10, by johncodie.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: JC, 8/18/10, by johncodie.
- Re: John Codie Mississippi, 8/18/10, by Deborah.
- Re: JC, 8/18/10, by Deborah.
|